Colorado Tax Proposals Face Uncertain Future as Vote Counts Narrow
A proposal to cap Colorado's income tax at 4.4% (Proposition 136) is currently trailing in unofficial vote counts, though the gap has narrowed. This measure competes with Amendment 87, which proposes a tiered income tax system, raising questions about which…

Colorado Springs Pueblo, CO, November 3, 2026 —
In Colorado, two significant tax initiatives are vying for voter approval, with unofficial results indicating a close race and potential legal complexities. Proposition 136, which proposes capping the state’s income tax rate at 4.4%, is currently trailing in the unofficial vote count. However, the margin has narrowed, suggesting a close outcome.
Adding to the complexity, Amendment 87, which advocates for a tiered income tax system, is also on the ballot. The presence of both measures raises questions about which initiative, if either, would ultimately become law should both receive sufficient voter support. The dynamics of competing ballot measures, especially those addressing similar fiscal policies, can lead to intricate legal and procedural challenges.
Details regarding the exact percentage of votes counted for each proposition and the precise narrowing of the gap for Proposition 136 were not provided in the available summary. Similarly, the specific details of the proposed tiered income tax system under Amendment 87, including the proposed tax brackets and rates, were not elaborated upon. The summary also did not specify the total number of votes cast or the current lead/deficit in numerical terms for either Proposition 136 or Amendment 87.
The outcome of these propositions will likely have a substantial impact on Colorado’s state revenue and tax structure. Proposition 136 aims to set a definitive cap on the income tax rate, potentially limiting future revenue growth if tax rates would otherwise need to increase. Amendment 87, conversely, suggests a move towards a progressive tax system, which could alter the tax burden based on income levels. The question of ballot measure precedence in cases of conflicting outcomes is a critical point that election officials and legal experts may need to address as final results emerge.
Story summarized from the original created by Thelma Grimes on gazette.com, see more information here.
Media gallery


